Welcome, Unregistered.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Reply
Old 20-Sep-2004, 08:01   #1
Vadi
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Austria
Posts: 446
Default 9800PRO or SE?

I need some advice please :

I want to buy a Radeon9800 card and I wonder if I should buy the PRO or the SE (128MB 256bit mem). I have a Barton 2600+ (166MHz FSB) and I want to play at 1280*960 (max because my CRT can't go higher at 85Hz) and at least at 1024*768. I'd like enough performance for shader intensive games (Doom3, QuakeIV, HL2, ...) too. I can get the PRO for 190 euros and the SE for 130.

Thanks in advance!
Vadi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-Sep-2004, 08:03   #2
jvd
Naughty Boy!
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: new jersey
Posts: 12,731
Send a message via AIM to jvd
Default

I would get the 9800pro. Check out newegg , they have some refurbished ones for 150$
__________________
Freexbox 360 !!!
Free Psp!
jvd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-Sep-2004, 08:50   #3
Vadi
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Austria
Posts: 446
Default

Thanks jvd!

I'm going to get the PRO then! I will pay the higher price because I want to buy it NOW at a local store.

Btw. I just tried the Doom3 demo and besides being nicely scary I excpected it to run much slower on my Nvidia 5600. But it ran absuletly fine on 800*600 at high quality! Carmack did a very good job!
Vadi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-Sep-2004, 09:15   #4
jvd
Naughty Boy!
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: new jersey
Posts: 12,731
Send a message via AIM to jvd
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vadi
Thanks jvd!

I'm going to get the PRO then! I will pay the higher price because I want to buy it NOW at a local store.

Btw. I just tried the Doom3 demo and besides being nicely scary I excpected it to run much slower on my Nvidia 5600. But it ran absuletly fine on 800*600 at high quality! Carmack did a very good job!
I guess good thing it didn't come out last year though huh
__________________
Freexbox 360 !!!
Free Psp!
jvd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-Sep-2004, 09:30   #5
Vadi
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Austria
Posts: 446
Default

I think that they decided to refine Doom3 because HL2 was delayed.
Vadi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-Sep-2004, 09:41   #6
Scali
Naughty Boy!
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,127
Send a message via ICQ to Scali Send a message via MSN to Scali
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vadi
I think that they decided to refine Doom3 because HL2 was delayed.
I think it's because especially the CPU-requirements for Doom3 are quite high (the 1.5 GHz recommendation is silly, it is almost too slow to play on my 1800+, even though I have a Radeon 9600Pro, it drops under 10 fps when there are more than 2-3 enemies, regardless of the resolution and quality I choose).
It is not that heavy on the videocard actually. My brother plays it quite okay in 800x600 medium detail on his Radeon 8500.
And ofcourse the FX5600 is an excellent card for Doom3. It has the double z-only fillrate, it has double-sided stenciling, it has the depth-bounds thing, and it's an NVIDIA, meaning there are specific optimizations both in the Doom3 engine and in the driver.
Sadly Doom3 is probably about the only modern game where an FX5600 performs nicely

Please tell us how your new card performs in Doom3, I wouldn't be surprised if there isn't a large difference with the FX5600, because the FX5600 may already have been CPU-limited.
On the bright side, you may be able to increase resolution and/or AA level with your new card.
That's what I did on my PC anyway. Whether I played 640x480 low detail or 1024x768 high detail didn't matter one bit for the framerate in most cases.
Scali is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-Sep-2004, 12:36   #7
Vadi
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Austria
Posts: 446
Default

Oh my the drivers are worse than I suspected. Can someone help me please? I've installed the Catalyst 4.9 drivers + the control centre on WinXP Home SP2. But it won't switch to something other than 60Hz (I've got a CRT)! The box sais it's 85Hz for example but nothing changes (apart from the short screen go blank)! In the control centre it reports weird available refresh rates like 43,46,60! NOooo!

edit: I've tried both standard and the specific drivers for the monitor.
Vadi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-Sep-2004, 13:01   #8
Vadi
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Austria
Posts: 446
Default

Whew. Ok I installed the drivers without the control centre now. In order to get more than 60Hz I had to specify the maximum refresh rate in ATI's "display" tab. Is this normal? Because I'm sure there wasn't this tab when the control centre was installed. And as I said the control centre dind't let me specify higher rates than 60Hz. Anywas it's no biggie because I found out that the control centre's profiles weren't triggered by apps (I better had read Dave's review properly ).
Vadi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-Sep-2004, 13:42   #9
Vadi
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Austria
Posts: 446
Default

The 9800 Pro performs fine at 1024*786, 6*AA, 16*AF, high qual. (a little more choppy than the 5600 in large rooms [like the dropship hangar] but still above 20fps). In the rooms with the quarter turns and the rotating light the lit metal looks much better. The AA looks great of course. Scali I wanted exactly that: higher or equal resolution plus better AA and AF!

I thought that the Imp's eyes glow red though.


edit: I think that the 5900 was the first one to have Ultra shadow but the 5600 doesn't have it.

edit: While Doom3 detected high quality at 800*600 with the 5600, now it suggests low quality.
Vadi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-Sep-2004, 20:24   #10
Vadi
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Austria
Posts: 446
Default

Me again!

My ugly cheapo PSU didn't cut it so I bought the Enermax 350W (EG365) for 60 euros. Great PSU! Voltages are good (32A@3,3V; 32A@5V; 26A@12V; 1A@-5V/-12V; total W@3,3+5V=185W), the 9 cm fan (the fans are aligned as recommended by ATX or AMD: one above the CPU and another one blows out at the back) is connected to the mainboard allowing temp readings and fan speed control, while the fan at the back can be controlled by a dial knob. I'm happy now!
Vadi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-Sep-2004, 00:33   #11
Guden Oden
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,201
Default

Vadi,

Now try your hand at a little overclocking action with ATiTool, maybe stick on some ramsinks too, etc. You're going to see this card can really fly.

The Catalyst driver itself is really solid, but the control center is a mess unfortunately. ATi should not have released it, or at least not in its present state. Too buggy, and WAY too fuckin big. It's more bloated than a hippo pregnant with quadruplets! :? It sucks...
__________________
Top one reason why capital punishment is immoral and wrong:
You can release an innocently convicted man from jail,
but you cannot release an innocently convicted man from death.
Guden Oden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-Sep-2004, 02:04   #12
Vadi
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Austria
Posts: 446
Default

I'm too lazy for that. The Atitool is cool! I "overclocked" to 400 core and 354 mem.
Vadi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-Sep-2004, 06:56   #13
The549
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: norcal
Posts: 415
Default

Did you use a driver cleaner? That might help if there are problems with the Cat control center. And yeah that's pretty pathetic that Doom detects lower settings just because you now have a better card that happens to be made by ati.
Although how the heck can you run it on those settings? Do you have the 256meg version? My 128 meg radeon 9800 pro barely makes 1024x768 high without aa at all.
The549 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-Sep-2004, 10:38   #14
Vadi
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Austria
Posts: 446
Default

I didn't use driver cleaner. But I don't need it anyway because it doesn't provide application triggered profiles. I use the newest omega drivers now where Radlinker is included and this allows application triggered profiles.

It's the 128MB version (the Geforce 5600 was 256MB). Maybe it runs well because I have 1024MB ram? Otherwise nothing unusal here (166MHz FSB, Audigy2 ZS [also new ]).


edit: I wanted to say that Ati's drivers are actually much better than Nvidia's because now I can play older games again (alternate texel centre option)!
Vadi is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
upgrade 9800pro to x800pro mito Hardware & Software Talk 2 18-Jul-2005 01:47
ATI Radeon 9800pro VS ATI Radeon x700XT Milkman 3D Hardware, Software & Output Devices 2 22-Sep-2004 08:00
Doom 3 - Vertical spikes all over the place with 9800pro MadMan PC Games 7 10-Aug-2004 10:49
am I gonna have problems with my 9800pro sharing an IRQ with Zarich 3D Hardware, Software & Output Devices 8 12-Mar-2004 08:27
should i realy buy an ati radeo 9800pro? ice-eric 3D Hardware, Software & Output Devices 27 25-Feb-2004 22:45


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:56.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.