Welcome, Unregistered.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Reply
Old 03-May-2004, 19:46   #1
rwolf
Rock Star
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 961
Default TechnologyReview Patent Scorecard

Lookup ATI and Nvidia on the patent scorecard.

The artical is here...

http://www.technologyreview.com/scorecards/

The excel format scorecard is here....

http://www.technologyreview.com/arti...atents0504.xls
rwolf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-May-2004, 19:55   #2
Eronarn
Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 247
Send a message via AIM to Eronarn Send a message via MSN to Eronarn
Default

125 to 25, eh...?

I like those numbers. :D
__________________
We shall swim out to that brooding reef in the sea and dive down through black abysses to Cyclopean and many-columned Y'ha-nthlei, and in that lair of the Deep Ones we shall dwell amidst wonder and glory for ever.
Eronarn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-May-2004, 20:04   #3
MfA
Regular
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 5,229
Send a message via ICQ to MfA
Default

On the one hand it is hard to understand a publication affiliated with MIT equating number of patents to technology strength ... on the other, patent inflation is a lot like publication inflation. The quality of the average scientific paper these days is a lot like the quality of the average patent. So it isnt that strange they have blinders on regarding the issue.

In patents publish or perish is an illusion though ... companies which do well only need to get good patents, and investors dont buy the "look how many patents we produce" when a company is doing poorly anyway. It is just a little circlejerk managers and analysts play with eachother and which anyone with common sense ignores.
MfA is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-May-2004, 20:30   #4
3dilettante
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Well within 3d
Posts: 4,136
Default

Unless you think in terms of possible future litigation.

In that case, patent everything in the broadest, most confusing terms possible and hope something sticks.
__________________
Dreaming of a .065 micron etch-a-sketch.
3dilettante is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-May-2004, 22:14   #5
MfA
Regular
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 5,229
Send a message via ICQ to MfA
Default

If you have no intention of winning there are plenty of excuses to drag someone to court. Trivial patents wont get you anything in a court of law either.
MfA is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-May-2004, 03:45   #6
rwolf
Rock Star
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 961
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MfA
On the one hand it is hard to understand a publication affiliated with MIT equating number of patents to technology strength ... on the other, patent inflation is a lot like publication inflation. The quality of the average scientific paper these days is a lot like the quality of the average patent. So it isnt that strange they have blinders on regarding the issue.

In patents publish or perish is an illusion though ... companies which do well only need to get good patents, and investors dont buy the "look how many patents we produce" when a company is doing poorly anyway. It is just a little circlejerk managers and analysts play with eachother and which anyone with common sense ignores.
My thoughts exactly. Quality not quantity.
rwolf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-May-2004, 04:06   #7
3dilettante
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Well within 3d
Posts: 4,136
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MfA
If you have no intention of winning there are plenty of excuses to drag someone to court. Trivial patents wont get you anything in a court of law either.
It really is dependent on how willing the other party is to go to court. Worse, the courts aren't getting much more tech-savvy as the years go by, not at any rate near enough to match research pace.
__________________
Dreaming of a .065 micron etch-a-sketch.
3dilettante is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A SONY Patent: PS3 A Hybrid Tile Based Deferred Renderrer? j^aws Console Technology 25 03-Aug-2004 13:28
Look at this Google-cached (pulled down) PlayStation 3 page Panajev2001a Console Technology 224 21-Feb-2004 21:32
SCE patent: PSP very fast multi-pass ? VERY INTERESTING HSR Panajev2001a Console Technology 27 10-Sep-2003 23:46
Microsoft and why the USPO sucks Vince Console Technology 16 09-Jun-2003 08:33


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:23.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.