Quote:
Originally Posted by Butta
Depends on the set up. Based on what this guy is showing, I would say the PS3 looks better (colour wise) but that is simply a calibration thing... textures seems identical!!!
http://ps3forums.com/showpost.php?p=...7&postcount=80
PS Dot50Cal what kind of component cable are you using on the PS3? |
Official 360 / PS3. Heres two more:
http://dot50cal.the-horror.com/gaf/dmc4/PS39.png
http://dot50cal.the-horror.com/gaf/dmc4/3609.png
They are still a bit compressed from the video codec, but they dont have the JPG artifacts as the others do.
Last ones I'll do unless someone requests something specific/meaningful. These are completely lossless, so there aren't any compression artifacts.
http://dot50cal.the-horror.com/gaf/dmc4/PS38.png
http://dot50cal.the-horror.com/gaf/dmc4/3608.png
I tested applying a slight sharpen effect on the PS3 version and it looks like a dead match for the 360 one. Can anyone say if the 360's default output is sharpened more? Also, which would you say is lighting more correctly here, because there are certainly differences. I'm beginning to wonder if the PS3 has some post processing effects being applied thats making the textures appear lower resolution when they aren't.