![]() |
I propose a new naming scheme:
Name: Viseon... oh come on. Number: (represents generation) abbreviated G1 Status: (place in the food chain) first letter represents segment, second letter represents place in that segment. First letters: L,M,X (low, medium, Xtreme!!!)(note higher letter = better). Second letters: R,S,T. (higher letter = better). Sample card lineup: AMD Viseon G1.0 XT AMD Viseon G1.0 XS AMD Viseon G1.0 XR ... AMD Viseon G1.0 MT etc... ... AMD Viseon G1.0 LT etc... Refreshes denoted with decimal: AMD Viseon G1.1 XT Generational leaps get a new number: AMD Viseon G2.0 XT Hurray for a short, consistent, logical naming system. |
That's very good naming scheme. However, it's way too logical, good and simple to be used by AMD (or nVidia). :smile:
|
http://forum.catchride.com/style_emo...fault/puke.gif
Just Radeon 2 GT/XT/XTX thanks. Poor/Average/Highend users :wink: |
I say call it the Radeon-and-on :D
|
Quote:
|
Naming is decided by marketing & marketing likes short sensible names like AMD ATI Radeon HD X39050 XTX Limited Edition Extreme Model Deluxe :roll:
|
Quote:
personally i have a simple way to solve the naming confusion, i just go to the store and say to the guy "give me the one that costs way wayyy wayyyyyy too much money" actually i just lurk here and learnded it all as the new stuff pops up |
Could be worse. Just imagine if Leadtek was making AMD based cards :razz:
|
Quote:
|
Well, at least the Tunis Press Briefing appears to be underway.
|
Quote:
|
instead of G1, G2 etc. make it 1G, 2G, 3G just like mobile phones:cool:
|
"Preview" or should I say all_rumors_so_far_compiled :sly:
http://it-review.net/index.php?optio...=1288&Itemid=1 |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
This is a intresting bit from that artical...
Quote:
Quote:
|
Do they have R600 down as a 65nm chip?
|
So its 65 nm now ??
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
http://www.fudzilla.com/index.php?op...d=656&Itemid=1
ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT TURBO SILENT Heatpipe 512MB GDDR3 VIVO TV-Out/Dual DVI (PCI-Express) - Retail overclockers.co.uk is a little early. :) |
You know, I am looking at the pictures of R600 heatsink... that thing is impressive. I wonder how much it costs.
|
I'm wondering if that site got their numbers mixed up.
They have R600 consuming upwards of 270 W. If everything's supposedly 65nm, then one would think R600 wouldn't be burning the rumored wattage of the 80nm part. |
Quote:
Ouch! "Sound Physics" comes from an Inq/Fud article where, as usual the lousy grasp of english turned "Sound and Physics" into "Sound Physics".. which got it-review wetting it's panties.. .nothing to worry about... |
http://www.fudzilla.com/index.php?op...=657&Itemid=34
copper http://www.fudzilla.com/images/stori...r600_pic_2.jpg Fudo says the 8pin is only for overclocking/overdrive... |
Quote:
BTW, I must be the only person in the world who thinks that spending GPU transistors on sound processing is a dubious idea. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 19:57. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.